Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Mark Hadfield Subject: Re: memory for large fortran arrays: problem fixed Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 08:51:15 +1200 Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: <42810337 DOT 7050100 AT bellsouth DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) In-Reply-To: <42810337.7050100@bellsouth.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes Charles D. Russell wrote: > The following seems important enough to fortran users > to be indexed by an appropriate subject header. > >> I am reluctant to upgrade because the use of large static >> fortran arrays with cygwin/g77 seems to be a fragile issue >> and my current installation is now working (but only with >> -mno-cygwin). > > That one is *well-and-truely* fixed, solved, sorted, > straightened out, banged on the head, put to bed, laid to rest, > and otherwise dealt with! Really! I'm not sure if the fix was > in 1.5.16 or if you'd need to use a recent snapshot, The fix was in a post-1.5.16 snapshot, ca 29 April. See http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-04/msg01309.html http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-04/msg01337.html > but the underlying problem is *completely* gone Thanks for confirming that. > and will not be returning any time soon. Now that's just tempting fate... -- Mark Hadfield "Ka puwaha te tai nei, Hoea tatou" m DOT hadfield AT niwa DOT co DOT nz National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/