Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <4277B099.2050609@echotech.ch>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 19:10:49 +0200
From: Matthias Bertschy <matthias AT echotech DOT ch>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: [Fwd: Re: impossible to restore MBR using dd]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Ovh-Remote: 213.162.28.121 (egw2.echotech.ch)
X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net)
X-Spam-Check: fait|type 1&3|0.0|H 0.5



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: impossible to restore MBR using dd
Date: 	Tue, 03 May 2005 19:10:20 +0200
From: 	Matthias Bertschy <matthias AT echotech DOT ch>
To: 	Eric Blake <ericblake AT comcast DOT net>
References: 
<050320051554 DOT 17789 DOT 42779EC1000829600000457D22007358340A050E040D0C079D0A AT comcast DOT net> 




Hello Blake,

Eric Blake wrote:

>>Hello,
>>
>>Cygwin version: 1.5.12
>>    
>>
>
>Can't you upgrade?  coreutils-5.3.0-5 is out, and requires a newer version of cygwin.  Perhaps with the latest versions you may pick up a bug fix along the way that helps solve your problem.  Also, see http://cygwin.com/problems.html to give us more information so we can help you better.
>
>  
>
As suggested, I have upgraded to the latest cygwin. Unfortunately, it 
doesn't change the results :-(

>>For safety reasons, I would like to restore only the first 446 bytes of 
>>the MBR to keep the existing partition table.
>>
>>The command line to use would normally be:
>>    dd if=boot.MBR of=/dev/sda bs=446 count=1
>>-->    dd: writing '/dev/sda': No space left on device
>>          1+0 records out
>>          0+0 records in
>>(I also tried with bs=512 and I get the same output)
>>    
>>
>
>Hmm - writing just 446 bytes to raw devices is not very safe.  /dev/sda is a block-special device for a reason, and writing anything more or less than a full block at a time on a block-special device is not guaranteed to work.  Maybe that is your problem?  Also, according to `stat /dev/sda', the IO block size of an NTFS raw device is 1024, so even bs=512 may be equally dangerous.
>
>  
>
Maybe I should recall you that on Linux, we can safely write 446 bytes 
blocks to a raw device. Indeed, the command dd if=boot.MBR of=/dev/sda 
bs=446 count=1 works under Linux.
I also don't understand why you are using NTSF raw devices to access the 
MBR... after all the MBR isn't formatted at all !

I think I will fill a bug report for the dd command under Cygwin. Could 
you point me where to do it?
(or maybe for Cygwin's ability to access raw devices)

>  
>
>>PS: If I do only:
>>    dd if=//./physicaldrive0
>>--> dd is wrinting things on the command line.
>>
>>    
>>
>
>That's to be expected.  The of= flag is necessary to tell dd to put the output in the named (device) file, rather than on stdout.
>  
>
I know :-) that was just to point out that without any bs parameter, the 
dd command works.

>--
>Eric Blake
>cygwin coreutils maintainer
>
>
>  
>
Matthias



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/