Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 23:07:38 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: mkstemp bug Message-ID: <20050430030738.GD24555@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20050429142946 DOT GB7328 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20050430003800 DOT C9F4413C0BB AT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050430003800.C9F4413C0BB@cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 07:39:04PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 09:01:07PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: >> >[snip] >> >>>So when I say "fifos just barely work" you felt the need >> to inform me >> >>>that they don't work? And that advances the discussion >> how, exactly? >> >> >> >>I did not just tell you that they are broken. I also gave >> you a test >> >>case for FIFOs. I think such a test case is useful for development >> >>and debugging. >> >> >> > >> >Dude, you are just *asking* for one heck of a zinger! >> >> Hey Gary! I'm responding to you again! >> > >Oh heavens! I hope its "manic" day! At any rate, I do appreciate the >public, as opposed to private, responses. Hmm. Let's see if I can respond to this without questioning *your* mental state. It's going to be very hard but I will try. >>(cue to Gary, in a "Sound Of Music" shot, arms outswept singing to the >>sky) >> > >Yeah, don't really get that one, sorry. Ya see, Gary. I haven't been responding to you for years but you've been calling me names in email every few months. Sometimes you respond to something I've said. Sometimes you you feel the need to comment on what you think I'm going to do. Sometimes you speculate that you've done something to change my behavior. You did all this while I was almost completely silent. That led me to believe that you were desperately hoping for some contact with me. I can see that I must have been somewhat right given the length of your reply. Anyway, I'm glad I've finally given your urges some tangible outlet. >>I sent you the signed photograph that you kept pestering me for and I >>thought that now we'd be internet buddies. Was it because I didn't >>sign it "Hugs and Kisses, cgf" as you'd requested? > >If you aren't just pulling somebody's leg there: - I never requested >any such photograph. - I never received any such photograph. Right. Gotcha. *wink* cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/