Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 22:54:24 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Bespoke installations: simple elegance of setup.exe when setup.ini is absent Message-ID: <20050430025424.GC24555@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20050429152750 DOT GD10017 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20050430000656 DOT 50D3813C1C8 AT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050430000656.50D3813C1C8@cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 07:06:43PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 08:58:44PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: >> >[snip] >> > >> >Ahem. As one of the many people responsible for setup, I take issue >> >with the accusation that it is either "simple" or "elegant". >> > >> >;-) >> >> In this case, "responsible for setup" == "submitted some >> patches in 2003 and ignored most (all?) setup problems since then". >> >> cgf > >Your welcome. > >Get over me Chris: "one of the many people responsible for setup". I know >you didn't miss the qualifier there, so why the hate? Only you can help >you, Chris. You haven't been a "setup developer" for a long time. I'm just trying to keep you honest, Gary, old bean, just like you've been doing for me all of these years. Surely, you don't mind my taking pot shots at you whenever I think you've done something wrong do you? How could you possibly mind that? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/