Message-Id: <200504300044.j3U0igHl014138@delorie.com> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" To: Subject: RE: mkstemp bug Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 19:46:03 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: X-IsSubscribed: yes > > * Gary R. Van Sickle > [2005-04-28 21:01:07 -0500]: > > > > [snip] > >> > So when I say "fifos just barely work" you felt the need to > >> inform me > >> > that they don't work? And that advances the discussion > >> how, exactly? > >> > >> I did not just tell you that they are broken. > >> I also gave you a test case for FIFOs: > >>>>> > >>Try > >> mkfifo foo > >> xterm -e 'tty >> foo; cat foo' > >> (now foo can be used by other tty application to > communicate with the > >>user via the dedicated xterm - works in linux but not cygwin). > >>>>> > >> I think such a test case is useful for development and debugging. > > > > Dude, you are just *asking* for one heck of a zinger! > > > Sorry, I am not sure I understand what you mean. > (PS it may be because English is not my native language...) > Oh, sorry, by "zinger" I was referring to a type of response such as the snotty one you got in reply to your statement "Yes, it appears that they are heavily broken" and your test case. And no need to be sorry; I do tend to abuse the English language rather badly. -- Gary R. Van Sickle -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/