Message-Id: <200504300006.j3U06qp1011357@delorie.com>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: Bespoke installations: simple elegance of setup.exe when setup.ini is absent
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 19:06:43 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <20050429152750.GD10017@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
X-IsSubscribed: yes

> On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 08:58:44PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> >[snip]
> >
> >Ahem.  As one of the many people responsible for setup, I take issue 
> >with the accusation that it is either "simple" or "elegant".
> >
> >;-)
> 
> In this case, "responsible for setup" == "submitted some 
> patches in 2003 and ignored most (all?) setup problems since then".
> 
> cgf

Your welcome.

Get over me Chris: "one of the many people responsible for setup".  I know
you didn't miss the qualifier there, so why the hate?  Only you can help
you, Chris.

-- 
Gary R. Van Sickle
 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/