Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 11:27:50 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Bespoke installations: simple elegance of setup.exe when setup.ini is absent
Message-ID: <20050429152750.GD10017@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20050429015728 DOT 2563913C0BB AT cgf DOT cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050429015728.2563913C0BB@cgf.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i

On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 08:58:44PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>[snip]
>
>Ahem.  As one of the many people responsible for setup, I take issue with
>the accusation that it is either "simple" or "elegant".
>
>;-)

In this case, "responsible for setup" == "submitted some patches in 2003
and ignored most (all?) setup problems since then".

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/