Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 09:08:44 -0600 From: Mark Paulus Subject: Re: 1.5.16: Filename case sensitivity problem In-reply-to: <20050429144627.GE7328@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" Message-id: <0IFP00342REK5F@pmismtp01.mcilink.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Does this work require an assignment? Is CVS having problems right now? (When I try to login, I get: $ export CVSROOT=:pserver:anoncvs AT cygwin DOT com:/cvs/src mpaulus AT ndctib03:/users/home/tibco/mpaulus/cygwin $ cvs login Logging in to :pserver:anoncvs AT cygwin DOT com:2401/cvs/src CVS password: cvs [login aborted]: reading from server: Connection reset by peer mpaulus AT ndctib03:/users/home/tibco/mpaulus/cygwin This directly from http://cygwin.com/cvs.html On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:46:27 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 08:10:07PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote: >>Zhuang Jianmin wrote: >> >>> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Cygnus Solutions\Cygwin\mounts v2\/usr/src >>> (default) = `e:\cygwin\usr\src' >>> flags = 0x0000080a >> >>This mount is a managed mount. The MOUNT_ENC bitflag is 0x800... >> >>> e:\cygwin\usr\src /usr/src system binmode >> >>...although it appears that cygcheck does not report this flag in its >>output. Still, if you run "mount -m" it should show the option "-o >>managed" next to the command that would create that mount. You can find >>more information on the -o flags that mount takes in "man mount". >> >>I am not sure how this mount came to be if you did not create it. I was >>under the impression that neither setup.exe nor any packages enable >>managed mounts. It looks like that is not the case. >Anyone want to submit a patch which ensures that all of the mount flags >are represented correctly by cygcheck? >cgf >-- >Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple >Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html >Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html >FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/