Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 09:08:44 -0600
From: Mark Paulus <mark DOT paulus AT mci DOT com>
Subject: Re: 1.5.16: Filename case sensitivity problem
In-reply-to: <20050429144627.GE7328@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-id: <0IFP00342REK5F@pmismtp01.mcilink.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Does this work require an assignment?
Is CVS having problems right now?  
(When I try to login, I get:  


$ export CVSROOT=:pserver:anoncvs AT cygwin DOT com:/cvs/src
mpaulus AT ndctib03:/users/home/tibco/mpaulus/cygwin
$ cvs login
Logging in to :pserver:anoncvs AT cygwin DOT com:2401/cvs/src
CVS password:
cvs [login aborted]: reading from server: Connection reset by peer
mpaulus AT ndctib03:/users/home/tibco/mpaulus/cygwin

This directly from http://cygwin.com/cvs.html

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:46:27 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:

>On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 08:10:07PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
>>Zhuang Jianmin wrote:
>>
>>> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Cygnus Solutions\Cygwin\mounts v2\/usr/src
>>>   (default) = `e:\cygwin\usr\src'
>>>   flags = 0x0000080a
>>
>>This mount is a managed mount.  The MOUNT_ENC bitflag is 0x800...
>>
>>> e:\cygwin\usr\src  /usr/src   system  binmode
>>
>>...although it appears that cygcheck does not report this flag in its
>>output.  Still, if you run "mount -m" it should show the option "-o
>>managed" next to the command that would create that mount.  You can find
>>more information on the -o flags that mount takes in "man mount".
>>
>>I am not sure how this mount came to be if you did not create it.  I was
>>under the impression that neither setup.exe nor any packages enable
>>managed mounts.  It looks like that is not the case.

>Anyone want to submit a patch which ensures that all of the mount flags
>are represented correctly by cygcheck?

>cgf

>--
>Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
>Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
>FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/





--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/