Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <426EC453.EE68B76@dessent.net> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:44:35 -0700 From: Brian Dessent Organization: My own little world... MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin List Subject: Re: Any fix to cygheap_fixup_in_child failure after rebaseall? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Bruce Dobrin wrote: > > I did use rebaseall -T /usr/local/bin > > But I've always been a bit hazy as to what the proper format for > rebaseall was.... That won't work. The argument to -T is a filename of a file containing a list of additional files to rebase, one per line. It can also take '-' to mean a list on stdin. However when you do rebaseall you want to make sure that as few cygwin programs are invoked as possible, otherwise you risk their DLLs being in use and the rebase will abort. (This is why you must run it from a plain bash CMD.EXE prompt, not rxvt or xterm.) Therefore you should be careful if you use '-' so that you don't have DLLs in use. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/