Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <426B1A30.F99D6478@dessent.net> Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 21:01:52 -0700 From: Brian Dessent Organization: My own little world... MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: possible DLL license violations References: <42691DCE DOT 5040809 AT acm DOT org> <42693AE5 DOT 4040305 AT acm DOT org> <42699DB0 DOT 60404 AT acm DOT org> <6 DOT 2 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 20050423153212 DOT 087f16e0 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net> <95a883060504231828afd0db8 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <426AFD88 DOT FD0285FD AT dessent DOT net> <20050424032009 DOT GA20096 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>anyone else's. I only chime in because as best I understand it, once > >>having found a violator the rights holder must act to protect said > >>rights; failing to do so may be construed as similar to consent. > > > >That applies only to trademarks, not copyright or patents. > > I was informed by Red Hat counsel that it was important to protect > copyrights, too. In that case... IANALATEIHSMBSI. (Replace 'You' with 'I' in http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#YANALATEYHSMBSI ) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/