Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 23:20:09 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: possible DLL license violations Message-ID: <20050424032009.GA20096@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <42691DCE DOT 5040809 AT acm DOT org> <42693AE5 DOT 4040305 AT acm DOT org> <42699DB0 DOT 60404 AT acm DOT org> <6 DOT 2 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 20050423153212 DOT 087f16e0 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net> <95a883060504231828afd0db8 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <426AFD88 DOT FD0285FD AT dessent DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <426AFD88.FD0285FD@dessent.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 06:59:36PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote: >beau wrote: >>anyone else's. I only chime in because as best I understand it, once >>having found a violator the rights holder must act to protect said >>rights; failing to do so may be construed as similar to consent. > >That applies only to trademarks, not copyright or patents. I was informed by Red Hat counsel that it was important to protect copyrights, too. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/