Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <42694214.1090905@x-ray.at> Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 20:27:32 +0200 From: Reini Urban User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: gcc 4.0 and 3.3 at the same time? References: <4268C047 DOT 4090200 AT familiehaase DOT de> <200504221345 DOT 04813 DOT mks AT schoenhaber DOT de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Jason FU schrieb: > Markus Schönhaber schoenhaber.de> writes: >>Am Freitag, 22. April 2005 13:27 schrieb Jason FU: >>>Gerrit P. Haase familiehaase.de> writes: >>>>Krzysztof Duleba wrote: >>Asking just out of curiosity: how are you affected by the simple possibility >>to install multiple versions off gcc? If you want just one version of gcc on >>your system, isn't installing just one version of gcc an option for you? >> >>BTW: On my Linux box, I have installed both gcc 3.3.5 and gcc 3.4. Obviously >>at most one of them is doing some work at a given time. > > I think GCC is a reliable tool. We don't need to have the old version to > co-exist for chaos. If you worry that GCC 4.0 doesn't work properly, why don't > you wait for a while for people's comments? With multiple versions of the same > development tool, you'll have infinite nightmares for your code. People who deploy/maintain libraries need multiple compilers. Not everyone is a end-user. For the 2.95 => 3.0 switch it was also usual to have both. -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ http://phpwiki.org/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/