Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Krzysztof Duleba" Subject: Re: gcc 4.0 and 3.3 at the same time? Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 15:49:51 +0200 Lines: 33 Message-ID: References: <4268C047 DOT 4090200 AT familiehaase DOT de> <200504221345 DOT 04813 DOT mks AT schoenhaber DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cng150.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478 X-IsSubscribed: yes Jason FU wrote: > > Asking just out of curiosity: how are you affected by the simple possibility > > to install multiple versions off gcc? If you want just one version of gcc on > > your system, isn't installing just one version of gcc an option for you? > > > > BTW: On my Linux box, I have installed both gcc 3.3.5 and gcc 3.4. Obviously > > at most one of them is doing some work at a given time. > > I think GCC is a reliable tool. We don't need to have the old version to > co-exist for chaos. Please don't include me in "we". > If you worry that GCC 4.0 doesn't work properly, why don't > you wait for a while for people's comments? > With multiple versions of the same > development tool, you'll have infinite nightmares for your code. You know, there is also third party code, too. And sometimes it just won't work with a different compiler. There are also some systems that won't upgrade g++ anytime soon. Developing your own code for such system is much easier when you have the same version of compiler and libraries. Regards Krzysztof Duleba -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/