Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Jason FU Subject: Re: gcc 4.0 and 3.3 at the same time? Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 13:28:29 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <4268C047 DOT 4090200 AT familiehaase DOT de> <200504221345 DOT 04813 DOT mks AT schoenhaber DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 218.190.210.59 (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050414 Firefox/1.0.3) X-IsSubscribed: yes Markus Schönhaber schoenhaber.de> writes: > > Am Freitag, 22. April 2005 13:27 schrieb Jason FU: > > Gerrit P. Haase familiehaase.de> writes: > > > Krzysztof Duleba wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > > Asking just out of curiosity: how are you affected by the simple possibility > to install multiple versions off gcc? If you want just one version of gcc on > your system, isn't installing just one version of gcc an option for you? > > Regards > mks > > BTW: On my Linux box, I have installed both gcc 3.3.5 and gcc 3.4. Obviously > at most one of them is doing some work at a given time. > > I think GCC is a reliable tool. We don't need to have the old version to co-exist for chaos. If you worry that GCC 4.0 doesn't work properly, why don't you wait for a while for people's comments? With multiple versions of the same development tool, you'll have infinite nightmares for your code. Thanks. Jason -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/