Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <42667BBA.50F9C6E0@dessent.net> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:56:42 -0700 From: Brian Dessent Organization: My own little world... MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin List Subject: Re: How well supported is csh/tcsh? References: <42667561 DOT 5040305 AT ieee DOT org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Jason Pearce wrote: > o Do most new/upgraded packages work or do you always have to port setup > scripts? In this case it shouldn't matter. All postinstall / preremove scripts are intended to be run by (and are in fact run by) /bin/sh, aka ash, regardless of what shell you choose as a user. Now if you're saying that you're going to remove ash then yes, expect a whole buttload of stuff to break. But if you just switch to tcsh as your default shell but leave ash sitting around as /bin/sh, then everything should be fine. The same thing goes for scripts used by packages (for example ssh-host-config) because they all reference /bin/sh or /bin/bash in the shebang, and so as long as you don't do something silly like remove ash or bash then you're fine. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/