Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 19:40:43 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Updated: inetutils-1.3.2-29
Message-ID: <20050419234043.GA6311@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20050419095023 DOT GL16098 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20050419233200 DOT E09F984C95 AT pessard DOT research DOT canon DOT com DOT au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050419233200.E09F984C95@pessard.research.canon.com.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i

On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 09:32:00AM +1000, Luke Kendall wrote:
>On 19 Apr, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>  - When updating inetutils, take care that syslogd.exe, inetd.exe and 
>>    subsequent processes don't run anymore.  Otherwise the update will 
>>    fail. 
>
>Does setup.exe take care of stopping them before updating them, or do
>you mean that topping them must be done manually?

So, your theory is that maybe Corinna went out of her way to mention
that services have to be stopped because that was going to happen
automatically?

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/