Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <425E610F.A881EA08@dessent.net> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 05:24:47 -0700 From: Brian Dessent Organization: My own little world... MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Bash Process Substitution References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Lev S Bishop wrote: > rather than the fifo that the binary package uses. So perhaps whoever > built the binary package didn't have /proc/self/fd for whatever reason? If I'm not mistaken /proc//fd capabilty was added 2005-02-01. The current bash package (2.05b-16) was released 2003-10-23. (the test version -17 was released 2004-11-22.) So it was quite impossible for the person who built bash to have that feature. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/