Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: ares.its.yale.edu: lsb32 owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 08:04:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Lev S Bishop To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: RE: Bash Process Substitution Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII I tried building bash from the source package, and then it uses either /dev/fd (if I have that as a symlink) or /proc/self/fd (if I don't), rather than the fifo that the binary package uses. So perhaps whoever built the binary package didn't have /proc/self/fd for whatever reason? With my built bash.exe, process substitution seems to work for input: $ echo <(ls) /proc/self/fd/63 $ cat <(echo hi) hi But not for output: $ tar -cf >(cat) syntax.c tar: /proc/self/fd/63: Cannot open: Permission denied tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now I'm not sure how there can be a permissions problem or what to do about it if there really is one, given that as I understand it the /proc/self/fd/63 is effectively a symlink to one end of something returned from pipe(2). Lev -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/