Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To: "'Cygwin List'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: cygwin (pipes?) VERY slow on Windows Server 2003 / AMD  Athlon 64
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:59:11 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.0.20050413124948.03cad920@pop.prospeed.net>
Message-ID: <SERRANOdEc83LUEM7RA0000012f@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Apr 2005 16:59:13.0310 (UTC) FILETIME=[1E7B93E0:01C5404A]

----Original Message----
>From: Larry Hall
>Sent: 13 April 2005 17:54

>> ----Original Message----
>>> From: Larry Hall
>>> Sent: 13 April 2005 16:45

>>> Actually, you ran with Cygwin 1.5.13 for this test despite the fact that
>>> you actually installed 1.5.14 via 'setup.exe' the last time you ran it.

> You mean the SETI AT home and related thread?  That's the only one I recall
> along this line.  That was solved in 1.5.14 and I assumed that the OP had
> actually run this problem against 1.5.14 as well, given his cygcheck
> output. That may be an invalid assumption.  

  Well, it certainly appears not to be self-consistent!  :)

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/