Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Dave Korn" To: "'Cygwin List'" Subject: RE: compile error - gcc or cygwin ? Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:53:17 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.0.20050412134219.03c29ed8@pop.prospeed.net> Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Apr 2005 17:53:07.0089 (UTC) FILETIME=[7B8D5810:01C53F88] ----Original Message---- >From: Larry Hall >Sent: 12 April 2005 18:44 > At 03:39 PM 4/9/2005, you wrote: >> Hi, >> >> After the last cygwin update (1005.14.0.0), >> I compiled a program using gcc 3.3.3 which >> setup says is the current version of gcc for cygwin. >> >> I got dozens of error messages all like this: >> "Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1) >> Please submit a full bug report. >> See for instructions." >> >> I have been compiling this program with cygwin/gcc >> for years without errors including the previous version of cygwin. >> >> Any ideas how I can find out exactly what's gone wrong ? >> Is there a gcc or cygwin error log somewhere ? > > No. WYSIWYG. If you can find a simple test case that demonstrates the > problem, others could see if they can reproduce it though. Bill could add "-v" to the gcc command line, get the cc1.exe command line, then invoke gdb on cc1 with the same args, and when it hit the segfault we'd perhaps have at least some rough idea what's going on. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/