Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Hans Horn" <hannes AT 2horns DOT com>
Subject:  Re: Bash 3.0?
Date:  Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:21:23 -0700
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <d3484c$1um$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <1110278641 DOT 5672 DOT 33 DOT camel AT cft125 DOT cinnober DOT com> <20050308111419 DOT GC2839 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p1.almaden.ibm.com
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Sounds like bash is currently up for grabs?

If that is so, I'd like to volunteer.
I've been running bash 3.0 (patch level 16) w/o any complaints.

greets,
Hans


Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar  8 11:44, Johannes Keukelaar wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> Whatever happened with Bash 3.0 for Cygwin? Can't find anything in
>> the archives after http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-08/msg01305.html
>> Is this still in the pipeline? Any idea how long it will take?
>
> The maintainer apparently disappeared.  If you want to take over bash
> maintainership, see http://cygwin.com/setup.html
>
> Corinna 




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/