Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:20:11 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin programs called from non-cygwin programs mauling \" in args Message-ID: <20050406112011.GH1471@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20050113064248 DOT GA2416 AT efn DOT org> <20050119233410 DOT GA2888 AT efn DOT org> <20050120092613 DOT GB4951 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20050406090903 DOT GA660 AT efn DOT org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050406090903.GA660@efn.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i On Apr 6 02:09, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > Corinna, have you a chance to think about this? I've come to think that > using the MinGW rules makes most sense. I didn't think any further about this. It's not that important since it's easily workaroundable. I also fear we get the usual complaints that zillions of scripts must be changed if we dare to break backward compatibility here. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/