Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Dave Korn" To: Subject: RE: XEmacs+aspell failed on cygwin 1.5.14-1 Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:41:22 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <20050405152755.GE19678@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Apr 2005 15:41:26.0947 (UTC) FILETIME=[EDCF1730:01C539F5] ----Original Message---- >From: Christopher Faylor >Sent: 05 April 2005 16:28 > On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:10:52PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:52:45AM -0400, xiet wrote: >>>>> The 2005-04-05 snapshot may fix this problem. It is being generated >>>>> now. >>>> >>>> I just replaced /bin/cygwin1.dll (~1.2M) with the snapshot (more than >>>> 8M?). >>> >>> The DLL is reported as 1,944 Kb on the web page. >>> >>>> cygcheck says the snapshot is 1.5.13-1. >>> >>> Um, no. cygcheck should say 1.5.15-1 if you are using the snapshot. >> >> You know, I suspect that the second oddity explains the first.... >> wasn't 1.5.13-1 one of the ones you generated with full debug info in? > > I haven't been stripping binaries for a while but the size on the web > page is accurate. The snapshot also does report 1.5.15. I checked both > things before responding. > > cgf I was suggesting he'd maybe downloaded an old snapshot by mistake. Having had a quick look at the webpage I see they aren't listed that far back, so it's not a possibility anyway. Oh, and BTW, it's the .bz2 file that is 1,944Kb. When you unbzip it, you do indeed get an ~8meg dll. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/