Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:27:55 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: XEmacs+aspell failed on cygwin 1.5.14-1 Message-ID: <20050405152755.GE19678@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20050405150621 DOT GD19678 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:10:52PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >>On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:52:45AM -0400, xiet wrote: >>>>The 2005-04-05 snapshot may fix this problem. It is being generated >>>>now. >>> >>>I just replaced /bin/cygwin1.dll (~1.2M) with the snapshot (more than >>>8M?). >> >>The DLL is reported as 1,944 Kb on the web page. >> >>>cygcheck says the snapshot is 1.5.13-1. >> >>Um, no. cygcheck should say 1.5.15-1 if you are using the snapshot. > >You know, I suspect that the second oddity explains the first.... >wasn't 1.5.13-1 one of the ones you generated with full debug info in? I haven't been stripping binaries for a while but the size on the web page is accurate. The snapshot also does report 1.5.15. I checked both things before responding. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/