Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <4249160B.9080506@atomice.net> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:47:07 +0100 From: Chris January User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: /proc/self/exename -> exe ? (Re: Retrieving name of executable) References: <41E811DB DOT 1030800 AT agilent DOT com> <20050114193528 DOT GA8109 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20050329043605 DOT GA23477 AT griboedov> <20050329083637 DOT GG23860 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20050329083637.GG23860@cygbert.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - quill.nothard.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - cygwin.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - atomice.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-IsSubscribed: yes Note-from-DJ: This may be spam Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mar 28 23:36, Anthony Heading wrote: > >>On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 02:35:28PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >>>On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 10:39:23AM -0800, Earl Chew wrote: >>> >>>>I think the name of the current executable is stored in myself->progname >>>>within cygwin1.dll. >>>> >>>>The more easily accessible __progname returns the basename of the >>>>executable. >>>> >>>>Is there a way for an application to obtain myself->program, other >>>>than resorting to raw win32 call to GetModuleFileName()? >>> >>>argv[0] or __argv[0] or /proc/self/exename >> >>Has this link been renamed? It appears to have changed to >>/proc/self/exe now, which has broken a lot of my programs... > > > The old exename was a file containing the path, the new exe is a symlink > pointing to the binary. This is how it's done on Linux. Maybe exename should be kept for backwards compatibility? Chris -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/