Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Hans Horn" Subject: doxygen status Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:02:47 -0800 Lines: 19 Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-67-124-97-127.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Gmane-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (score=9.962, required 6, BAYES_00 -2.60, HELO_DYNAMIC_DHCP 1.25, HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC 3.74, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR 4.40, PRIORITY_NO_NAME 1.10, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL 0.09, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 1.99) X-Gmane-MailScanner-SpamScore: sssssssss X-MailScanner-From: goc-cygwin AT m DOT gmane DOT org X-MailScanner-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-IsSubscribed: yes Note-from-DJ: This may be spam Group, I noticed that the vintage of doxygen that ships with cygwin (v1.2.18) is more than two years old. The current version of doxygen (1.4.1-20050315) builds ootb and appears to be functioning properly; I ran it on a mid-size C++ source tree and on a rather large Java source tree. When doing the latter, I noticed that the current vintage is almost infinitely faster than the one that is shipping with cygwin. The question is, is there a maintainer for doxygen, and if so, is she still alive and willing. If not, I'd like to step up to the plate and offer my services as new doxygen maintainer. greets, H. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/