Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: /proc//exe points to void Mail-Copies-To: never Reply-To: sds AT gnu DOT org X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. From: Sam Steingold In-Reply-To: <20050310220045.GC20798@cygbert.vinschen.de> (Corinna Vinschen's message of "Thu, 10 Mar 2005 23:00:45 +0100") References: <20050310220045 DOT GC20798 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:57:58 -0500 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain > * Corinna Vinschen [2005-03-10 23:00:45 +0100]: > > On Mar 10 16:00, Sam Steingold wrote: >> /proc//exe points to "foo", not to "foo.exe", so it cannot be >> opened &c. > ^^^^ > ???? how do I find out which file is running if /proc//exe cannot be opened? if open(/proc//exe) fails, this means that the executable has been removed! oh wait, this is cygwin... are you saying that open(/proc//exe) tries to open foo.exe, not foo, and fails because it is locked by windows because it is a running executable? -- Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k My inferiority complex is the only thing I can be proud of. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/