Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 15:37:42 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: loading of wsock32 disturbs FPU
Message-ID: <20050302143742.GZ18314@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <200503021306 DOT 32969 DOT r DOT schulz AT dkfz DOT de> <SERRANO8ARf3sllNY300000004a AT SERRANO DOT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <20050302143149 DOT GA3187 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050302143149.GA3187@cygbert.vinschen.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i

On Mar  2 15:31, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar  2 13:33, Dave Korn wrote:
> >   Hm.  We probably need to put a finit instruction into the autoload code
> > somewhere.  wsock_init () looks like just the place......  now if I just
> > persuade the CVS code to build without a SIG11 (grmbl grmbl....)
> 
> Hmm?  -v please.

I just added an finit call to wsock_init and it seems to work fine.

Are there any non-FPU CPUs >= i386 out there which would choke on this
machine instruction?  I guess not, but I'm not exactly fluent in ix86
history...


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/