Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Resent-Message-Id: <200502201947 DOT j1KJlosg023868 AT links DOT magenta DOT com> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 14:17:24 -0500 From: Raul Miller To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: cygpath -m (and -w) sometimes emits multi-line names Message-ID: <20050220141724.I32136@links.magenta.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Resent-From: moth AT magenta DOT com Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 14:47:50 -0500 Resent-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Manipluating the result of cygpath -m with shell tools is needlessly difficult. $ pwd /cygdrive/c/Program Files/Mozilla Firefox/defaults/profile $ cygpath -m `pwd`/bookmarks.htm | sed 's} }%20}g; s}^}file:///}' file:///c:/Program file:///Files/Mozilla file:///Firefox/defaults/profile/bookmarks.htm $ cygpath -v cygpath (cygwin) 1.36 Path Conversion Utility Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 Red Hat, Inc. Compiled on Nov 10 2004 $ grep = /cygwin.bat set CYGWIN=export ntsec ntea title $ I can't find any documentation on this "feature" of cygpath, and do not know if it is intentional and/or if it solves some other problem. If this behavior is intentional, it should be documented. [And, yes, I can work around this problem in a variety of ways. For example echo `pwd`/bookmarks.htm | sed 's}/cygdrive/c}file:///c:}; s} }%20}g;' works just fine. I can also pipe the output of cygpath through xargs echo. I can even write myself a shell script which will grab leading option arguments and then iterate over all non-option arguments, sticking `pwd` in front of each one that's not absolute and running cygwin individually on all of those, wrapping cygwin's output in echo and spitting the results out one per line (which would make cygpath useful with wildcards, and fit the standard pattern for unix commands). Of course all of these things could, at least in principle, be done in the executable itself, too... which would eventually be easier to deal with when I hop on random windows systems. But perhaps someone thinks the current awkward behavior was a good idea?] Thanks, -- Raul -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/