Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: setup.exe timestamp 1108087248: mined-2000.10-1: minor glitch From: fergus Reply-To: fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: fergus AT bonhard, uklinux DOT net AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1108148089.2372.24.camel@82-40-123-11.cable.ubr01.pert.blueyonder.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:54:53 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Feb 2005 18:55:28.0591 (UTC) FILETIME=[40E03DF0:01C5106B] > What is your *exact* problem? I visited the Cygwin site www.cygwin.com/setup.exe (as one does) and trawled for updates. This was about 12 hours ago. There were none, apparently. But I observed that setup.ini stamped ..7248 (just as it is now, in fact) had altered since my previous visit, and not in a minor way: there was a new provision in the form of mined. I had asked for not and in the usual way of things this would have been identified and downloaded and installed. All I had was the new setup.ini. I looked at it (a) to see what was new (mined) and (b) what was odd or wrong, leading to this failure. All that I observed even moderately unexpected was the blank line in the middle of ldesc. I closed it, wget'd mined into my local resource, and again used setup.exe, using "my" setup.ini and my local resource. The new provision was identified and installed. I deduced, wrongly, that my editing tweak was what had mended things. I later observed (see "More:" at 09.02) that a blank line in ldesc does not uniquely characterise mined, and therefore that something else, maybe to do with the exact timing of my visit to the mirror, was the cause of the glitch. And at least one other person (you) has successfully installed mined by conventional means. Sorry to go on, wasting bandwidth and people's time. I took your question "What is your *exact* problem" as just that: a request to expand on the nature of the glitch and maybe muse on its causes. It struck me when reading your post that an alternative interpretation might easily be that it was not a generous and thoughtful invitation, but an irritated commentary on my capability and thinking. But you're not like that, so I replied in the way that I have. Fergus -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/