Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <42081999.3000402@tlinx.org> Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 17:44:57 -0800 From: linda w User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041103) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Installing in root (was Re: Linux Journal Cygwin article) References: <4204CF9D DOT 8070407 AT buddydog DOT org> <4205DC20 DOT AEE603B2 AT dessent DOT net> <20050206160718 DOT GB13306 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20050206160718.GB13306@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Perhaps he has read that many developers and users on this list use "C:\" as the root diretory and have no problems. I had the impression that the advice to install into a subdirectory was more of a Covering One's Behind (COB?) when presenting cygwin as a commercial solution to vendors. I find it more useful to have it in the root directory, as I use my cygwin tools and shell to manage my XP machine instead of the Windows tools. I have yet to run into a problem with conflicting software ... Is it still worth the extra hassle of separating cygwin into it's own sub-root? I integrated my cygwin and windows home as well -- they are both "/home/"; i.e. "Documents and Settings" on my machine has been renamed/changed to /home. I strongly wish that I wouldn't get the "reminder" of not installing in "root" as I've had for the past three+ years -- if I've already installed there, I've already seen that warning message countless times before (sigh)... Maybe the advice not to install in root could be reconsidered? Has anyone had any problems installing in root? Defaulting to a subdirectory is probably the "right" thing to do, but on the good/bad scale, certainly choosing "\" to install in isn't like crossing the streams or something, eh? :-) -linda Christopher Faylor wrote: >And the author actually gives some bad advice of not using the default >c:\cygwin root directory, claiming that we said it was best to do things >that way. Why would we have a program with a default that >we didn't want people to use? > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/