Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:22:14 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: /proc functionality; ls errors Message-ID: <20050202172214.GM16117@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <41FC0A3E DOT 5020702 AT tlinx DOT org> <20050131091944 DOT GA18009 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <42006C72 DOT 2050706 AT tlinx DOT org> <20050202092804 DOT GB7084 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050202092804.GB7084@cygbert.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 10:28:04AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Feb 1 22:00, linda w wrote: >> Cool - does that mean it was a bug and was fixed, or did it just >> happen to disappear due to some other improvement? Either way... > >It was a bug which just didn't show up with ls from the old fileutils. > >> 'bout how long does it take till things go from CVS to a release, >> these days. > >Usually within the same year. > >> I've tried twice to build from CVS, but never seem >> to have gotten a full build to run w/no errors (not to mention having >> a woefully inadequate machine to build such a project on...(sigh)). > >Did you read http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_3.html#SEC104 lately? Otherwise, >as Brian wrote, try a snapshot. I thought that section was designed for punishment, not information. Corinna, you seem to forget that we make building cygwin very hard so that we are assured of job security. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/