Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <006501c5078e$9362e6d0$0200000a@agamemnon> From: "Jon A. Lambert" To: "Paolo Gesmundo" , References: <00b201c50767$a507e0b0$f968dc54 AT I2 DOT COM> <41FDEE90 DOT 54847D1A AT dessent DOT net> <00c301c5078b$07215240$f968dc54 AT I2 DOT COM> Subject: Re: Unable to properly execute a let statement from a shell script Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:15:38 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Paolo Gesmundo wrote: > Thanks for the responses. > > So, in cygwin for Win XP, is it possible to set my environment in > such a way that the default shell > is bash? > I have no clue, and I am not suggesting you do this but what would be the affect of... cp bash.exe sh.exe Besides the initial installation and possible later overwrite during update, what would be the side-affect of such a stunt? Does cygwin take advantage of ashism's that would break things? -- J. Lambert -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/