Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Andrew Schulman Subject: Re: su alternative for Win2k Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:14:11 -0500 Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <41FAA56C DOT 9040508 AT buddydog DOT org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pcp04399769pcs.nrockv01.md.comcast.net User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.70.2067 X-IsSubscribed: yes > I was just installing postgreSQL and ran across the problem with > getting initdb to run as the postgres user. As expected, I could > neither su nor login to work. Searching the archives and the like > for a fix, the most often specified one was to use ssh. But as I > don't run sshd, and it seems a shame to have to run this just to > get an su-like behaviour, that wouldn't work for me. Now I'm curious. I haven't tried to search for bug reports on su in Cygwin. But it's never worked for me. I always figured that I was just doing something wrong, but it was never important enough to find out what it was and fix it-- I just used 'Run As' instead, as you suggest. So now I wonder, is it not just me? Is su in Cygwin broken for everyone? Thanks, A. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/