Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:43:26 -0800 (PST) From: "Peter A. Castro" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Problem uninstalling/deleting cygwin In-Reply-To: <20050126192248.GA21938@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Message-ID: References: <6 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20050125123925 DOT 04fbea60 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net> <6 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20050125231005 DOT 05a33c40 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net> <20050126192248 DOT GA21938 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 11:10:49AM -0800, Peter A. Castro wrote: > >On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Larry Hall wrote: > >>Obviously, those who disagree with me are still free to answer the > >>inevitable posts that we'll get here about the "cygwin time machine" > >>anyway. With any luck, those posts will be few and far between so > >>there will be little need to discuss how much noise of this kind is too > >>much. > > > >Oh, come now, Larry. We had a hugh thread going concering the > >*content* of the fortune data files, which was totally off-topic for > >Cygwin, yet we all kept on beating that horse. Off-topic doesn't stop > >it from being discussed anyways. :) > > *Bzzzzzzzzzt* Wrong answer. I didn't know there was a question...wait, what show am I on? :) > It was certainly on-topic to discuss the contents of files that are > distributed in the cygwin package. I disagree on that. For the fortune related thread(s), it was not so much what was going into the package, but weither that content should be censored or not. Gary and several others were trading barbs concering "potty-mouth" language and religious/political views. Should moral/religious/political discussions be consider on-topic, then? I really want to know. > However, even if it wasn't, pointing to previous behavior which you > consider inappropriate and using it as an excuse to do the same is > really a rather unpersuasive way to make a point. It was more an observation than a point. And, while there are plenty of examples of this "excuse" in the archives, this kind of thing *does* continue to occur on this list, time and again. It's tantamount to saying "no talking in class", yet whispers are traded none-the-less. I'm not justifying it, mind you. Meerly pointing out the reality of it. Sorry if I ruffle your feathers over it. > cgf -- Peter A. Castro or "Cats are just autistic Dogs" -- Dr. Tony Attwood -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/