Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:22:48 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Problem uninstalling/deleting cygwin Message-ID: <20050126192248.GA21938@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <6 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20050125123925 DOT 04fbea60 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net> <6 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20050125231005 DOT 05a33c40 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 11:10:49AM -0800, Peter A. Castro wrote: >On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Larry Hall wrote: >>Obviously, those who disagree with me are still free to answer the >>inevitable posts that we'll get here about the "cygwin time machine" >>anyway. With any luck, those posts will be few and far between so >>there will be little need to discuss how much noise of this kind is too >>much. > >Oh, come now, Larry. We had a hugh thread going concering the >*content* of the fortune data files, which was totally off-topic for >Cygwin, yet we all kept on beating that horse. Off-topic doesn't stop >it from being discussed anyways. :) *Bzzzzzzzzzt* Wrong answer. It was certainly on-topic to discuss the contents of files that are distributed in the cygwin package. However, even if it wasn't, pointing to previous behavior which you consider inappropriate and using it as an excuse to do the same is really a rather unpersuasive way to make a point. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/