Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:46:41 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin bughunt (FAQ alert?) Message-ID: <20050122234641.GJ32005@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20050121163843 DOT GE20002 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20050121190233 DOT GD20866 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20050121194544 DOT GA138715 AT Worldnet> <20050121194720 DOT GF20866 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20050121222838 DOT GA141219 AT Worldnet> <20050122035454 DOT GA25952 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20050122210643 DOT GD32005 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 03:42:15PM -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 11:36:00AM -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: >> >To build a debugging version of the Cygwin DLL, you will need to follow >> >the instructions at http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_3.html#SEC102, adding the >> >`--enable-debugging' option to `../configure'. You can also contact the >> >mailing list for pointers (a simple test case that demonstrates the bug >> >is always welcome). > >On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 16:06:43 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> You must have missed my post where I said not to use the >> --enable-debugging option. >> >> Please remove the mention of the --enable-debugging option. This should >> only be done when you've been prompted to do so. It's for developers, >> not for normal users. > >Yep, I missed that. It's gone, but with the other FAQ additions it moved: > >http://cygwin.com/faq/faq0.html#SEC104 This feels vaguely like I'm programming in Fortran again. It would be nice (tm, (C), etc.) if there was some way to put permanent anchors in the FAQ so that we wouldn't have to rely on renumbered sections. Isn't there any way to accomplish that? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/