Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: Bill DOT Hughes AT cox DOT co DOT uk X-Msg-Ref: server-21.tower-14.messagelabs.com!1106306432!24130428!1 X-StarScan-Version: 5.4.5; banners=cox.co.uk,-,- Message-ID: From: "Hughes, Bill" To: "'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" Subject: RE: cygwin bughunt (FAQ alert?) Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:18:07 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-IsSubscribed: yes Christopher Faylor wrote: ..snip.. >> The snapshots page says that it's a stripped version. >> Who should I trust, the snapshot page or the FAQ? > > You should trust me when I tell you that the snapshots haven't been > stripped recently. > > However, oops, this means that the advice of using a snapshot > shouldn't go into the FAQ since this isn't a permanent arrangement. Out of curiosity, would it make sense to always build the snapshot with the debug info? Thinking about the 'hierarchy of ignorance' for want of a better term, does it require more knowledge to run gdb and give a sensible report or to build the dll and then do the same? I don't think I'm putting this very well, but it may make the FAQ easier if the standard advice is to load the snaphot and use that for debugging, it removes a separate layer of potential problems in building the dll. I suspect the people who would want a stripped snapshot to be more capable of producing it than those would may need to build one with debug info. Bill -- ___ oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile" (_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN \ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control /_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org This e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this email in error, please reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please note that we are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e-mail communications passing through our network. The views expressed in this email are not that of the company unless specified within the message. The inclusion of this footnote indicates that the mail message and any attachments have been checked for the presence of known viruses. If you have any comments regarding our policy please direct them to postmaster AT cox DOT co DOT uk ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information on a proactive email security service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ________________________________________________________________________ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/