Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:35:21 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: cygwin bughunt (FAQ alert?)
Message-ID: <20050120213521.GC11688@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <79F81D5F4790D344B05F489CE2AC8AB7109544 AT dubexdc03 DOT dubex DOT net> <20050120200455 DOT GK9369 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <cb51e2e05012012475c668d43 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 61 DOT 0501201627110 DOT 6491 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.61.0501201627110.6491@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:29:36PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
>
>> > On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 08:12:31PM +0100, David Dindorp wrote:
>> > >Tracking it down with GDB to cygwin_split_path() : 0x61073e06 was easy.
>> >
>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:04:55 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> > Since cygwin isn't built with debugging symbols, the symbols that you do
>> > see in gdb are basically meaningless.
>> >
>> > I think this has come up often enough to be a FAQ.  Joshua?
>> >
>> > In any event, you do need to either build a debugging version or, possibly,
>> > use a snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ since those are currently
>> > built with debugging turned on.
>>
>> Sure, how about this:
>>
>> I've found a bug in Cygwin, how can I debug it?
>>
>> Debugging symbols are stripped from distibuted Cygwin binaries, so any
>> symbols that you see in gdb are basically meaningless. It is also a good
>> idea to use the latest code in case the bug has been fixed, so you will
>> need to either build your own debugging version by following the
>> instructions at http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_3.html#SEC102 or use a current
>> snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
>
>The entry is good, but the title implies (*GASP*) that there may be bugs
>in Cygwin.  I'd suggest something like "I'm debugging within the Cygwin
>DLL space, and gdb shows garbage symbols.  How do I debug Cygwin?"

It is guaranteed that there are bugs in cygwin so I don't have any problems
with using this terminology.  However maybe it could be softented to something
like "I may have found a bug in Cygwin..."

An additional entry might be "Why do the symbols look funny when I try to
debug Cygwin?"

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/