Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:01:28 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: tetex 2.99 Message-ID: <20050117170128.GG20403@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <200501170710500 DOT SM01380 AT xuanson> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200501170710500.SM01380@xuanson> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 02:09:04PM +0100, Dr Jekyll wrote: >Hi, the tetex package of Cygwin is not up to date. Have anyone here succeed >in installing the tetex 2.99? Can you share your experience? I'm done! Good point. You can't just indiscriminately assume that DLLs are not executable since that would mean that the user would have no way to control this behavior. OTOH, I don't think we automatically have to flag DLLs on a non-acl-aware FS as executable either. Currently DLLs always show up as executable. I don't know how much work it would take to change this and I'm not particularly inclined to look into it but this is probably somewhere in the stat_worker function. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/