Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: RE: Ported PING MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:53:02 -0000 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Message-ID: <9D3B864C501E024B86A5ABF53972A66A0C0013@COMTVLEX02.ptcom.corppt.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Lino Miguel Martins Tinoco" To: "CygWin" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jan 2005 11:53:04.0193 (UTC) FILETIME=[1A1C4310:01C4FC8B] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id j0HBrxTn003285 Nope, sorry. It's a port of the first version of ping. The minimum response time presented is 1ms. Less than that you'll get 0ms. I'ts ok for checking conectivity and delay on slower links (or a far, far away host on internet :)) but not that good on fast links. --Lino Tinoco Lino Miguel Martins Tinoco wrote: > I've managed to port and compile the original ping code and a version > with a bit more statistical info (with median and and .0 precision on > the percentage of lost packets). I've also a package that compiles and > installs them. Does it give the improved "time precision" some of Cygwin funzions benefit? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/