Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 17:39:42 -0800 From: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Can "DLL's" & libraries be marked as non-executable? Message-ID: <20050117013942.GA3984@efn.org> References: <41E9D722 DOT 3010306 AT tlinx DOT org> <009001c4fba2$54223c20$e6ec6f83 AT robinson DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <41EAF139 DOT 6070102 AT tlinx DOT org> <41EAFB0B DOT 8080501 AT familiehaase DOT de> <20050117011343 DOT GE12175 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050117011343.GE12175@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Organization: bs"d X-IsSubscribed: yes On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 08:13:43PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 12:38:51AM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > >>More to the point, what would "break" in the cygwin environment, > > > >Try to chmod 644 any dll and call a program that uses this dll. This > >fails for me (on NT4 with NTFS), if it succeeds for you, fine. Change > >the permissions as you like it;) > > I think what's being asked is that we make a special case for dlls so > that, even if the OS says they are executable, cygwin will not call them > executable. But that's not possible without opening them; I can very well have a program file or script named foo.dll that I want to be exectutable. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/