Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:05:58 -0500 From: Jason Tishler To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: What is rebase and why did I need to run it on a fresh re-install? Message-ID: <20050113130558.GA1960@tishler.net> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <41E5EB15 DOT 5090203 AT sneakemail DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41E5EB15.5090203@sneakemail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Peter, On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 04:29:25AM +0100, Peter Valdemar M?rch wrote: > * What does rebase do? As its name implies, rebase rebases (i.e., changes) the base address of DLLs. See the following for more details: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/tools/tools/rebase.asp > * Why did I need to run it on my fresh cygwin install? Read the README: /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/rebase-2.3.README > * Why does Larry Hall recommend to run it, when there is a prominent > warning not to, unless I've "got a clue"? Sorry for the poor wording. The warning is for rebase -- not for rebaseall. IMO, rebaseall is safe to use. FWIW, I frequently rebase (via rebaseall) my entire Cygwin installation. > * What did I do wrong when I upgraded my installation? AFAICT, nothing. Jason -- PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/