Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: k2.mikee.ath.cx: mikee set sender to mikee AT mikee DOT ath DOT cx using -f Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 07:59:16 -0600 From: Mike To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Obscene content in cygwin file. Message-ID: <20050108135916.GA367@mikee.ath.cx> References: <200501080123 DOT j081N4d2028869 AT k2 DOT mikee DOT ath DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200501080123.j081N4d2028869@k2.mikee.ath.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Organization: The Math Forum X-IsSubscribed: yes On Fri, 07 Jan 2005, Gary R. Van Sickle might have said: > > Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > > > > > Good thing I didn't install it at work, and that I don't work at a > > > Megacorp that has whole departments devoted to rooting through > > > peoples' files looking for reasons to fire them. > > > > IMHO, this is the single best reason for obfuscating the > > profanity with rot13. > > -- > > Francis Litterio > > franl world . std . com > > > > Perhaps. Could somebody tell me the single-best reason for providing the > profanity at all? > > Hello? > > Anybody? define 'profane' first -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/