Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <01a601c4f52e$25bdc130$0200000a@agamemnon>
From: "Jon A. Lambert" <jlsysinc AT alltel DOT net>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <20050108012304 DOT SUGE28230 DOT ispmxmta02-srv DOT alltel DOT net AT sourceware DOT org>
Subject: Re: Obscene content in cygwin file.
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:00:01 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> Perhaps.  Could somebody tell me the single-best reason for providing
> the profanity at all?
>
> Hello?
>
> Anybody?

Apparently some distros have split off the package into parts like
fortune   - the program with no data
fortune-min  - the quotes
fortune-off   - the stuff that'd make a sailor blush

fortune-mod-boh
fortune-mod-homer
fortune-mod-bible-1.0

I'd of course prefer the following packaging:
fortune
fortune-min
fortune-mod-bible-1.0

But  not just because it would be amusing to see the half of the unoffended
suddenly start squealing about pulling it or encrypting it.



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/