Message-Id: <200501080156.j081uYYP030331@delorie.com> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" To: Subject: RE: Obscene content in cygwin file. Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:54:22 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: X-IsSubscribed: yes Note-from-DJ: This may be spam > Most agree that it's a packaging bug in fortune, and that the > limericks file should be renamed limericks-o and ROT13'd. > End of discussion. Nononono, don't you try to force your end-of-discussion values on ME! I agree that at a minimum, the obfuscation you describe is absolutely required. However, I'd like an answer to a question which I raised with a different poster: What's the reason to provide this profanity at all in the Cygwin distro? To the best of my knowledge, there are no Cygwin X-screensavers loaded with obfuscated pornographic pictures. I can't imagine one being accepted were it to be proposed by somebody. But dirty limericks get the green light? Why? But, in the intrest of the desire of many here to have their porn and limericks too, I offer this new constructive vote category suggestion: "[ ] I demand more filth! Add a new "Porn" category to Setup!" Frankly, I'd think just pulling the off-color material is the easiest solution from a legal, moral, technical, and argumentological standpoint. -- Gary R. Van Sickle -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/