Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: denver.icd.teradyne.com: sheltonv set sender to acs AT xemacs DOT org using -f To: ht AT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk (Henry S. Thompson) Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, xemacs-beta Subject: Re: Cannot build 21.4.16 under cygwin (gcc 3.3.3) References: <20050105210221 DOT GA2428 AT tishler DOT net> <20050106130856 DOT GA1068 AT tishler DOT net> <20050107121026 DOT GA3760 AT tishler DOT net> From: Vin Shelton Organization: The XEmacs Development Team Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:53:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Henry S. Thompson's message of "Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:46:07 +0000") Message-ID: <545r7kxnk8q.fsf@xemacs.org> Lines: 20 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii ht AT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk (Henry S. Thompson) writes: > > But of course then I'm stuck with other code that won't run because of > the two-different-bases problem. > > Anyway, thanks _very_ much for your help, it sounds like the xemacs > folks are really where this needs to be solved. Point is, this is a > regression -- xemacs-21.4.15 works OK (mind you, I haven't tried > recompiling it with gcc-3.3.3). Henry, AFAIK, we didn't make any changes in 21.4.16 that would account for this. As an experiment, can you try to build 21.4.15 with gcc-3.3.3? I would be surprised if that worked. - Vin Shelton Release Mgr for Stable XEmacs Branch -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/