Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <000e01c4f466$ca49eb20$5709a443@c40624a> From: "Raye Raskin" To: References: <20050107020605 DOT 542EC122ABC AT majesty DOT pobox DOT com> <000e01c4f45e$819e12a0$5709a443 AT c40624a> <20050107025715 DOT GH16048 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Subject: Re: Obscene content in cygwin file. Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:12:57 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" To: Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 6:57 PM Subject: Re: Obscene content in cygwin file. > On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 06:13:40PM -0800, Raye Raskin wrote: >>The problem seems simple to me. A filthy Limerick is not a Fortune. >> >>The program is misnamed. > > Hmm. Ever heard of "grep" or "ls"? Fortune is much closer to being named > something that makes sense than several other programs in the distribution. > > cgf If "grep" were named "delete" and everyone lived with it, then I could understand with your analogy. But the way it is, I can't. Maybe someone should ask Torvald, not Red Hat. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/