Message-Id: <200501070206.j072627p013507@delorie.com> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" To: Subject: RE: Obscene content in cygwin file. Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:03:47 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: X-IsSubscribed: yes Ah jeez deFaria: > Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > > > On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:54:16 -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > > > >> My write-in candidate: > >> [x] Not offended. Clean it up anyway. It's unprofessional in the > >> extreme and can only result in embarassment and trouble. > > > > As a Christian, I agree with Gary. :) > > > > I actually think it's an upstream bug. The limerick file meets the > > "offensive" category and so, according to the notes file, should be > > limerick-o and be rot-13 encrypted (then we can throw the DMCA at > > offended people, too). Looks like fortune is due for an > update to the > > /usr/share/doc/ FHS standard anyway. > > > > There is plenty of 1st Amendment content on the Internet, but let > > people get it elsewhere. > > As an atheist I always wonder why christians can "turn the > other cheek" > but cannot seem to muster how to turn their eyes away! As a thinking man, I always wonder why atheists: 1. Hate Christianity, yet harbor no such hatred towards all the other religions. 2. Would squeal bloody murder if fortune spit out Bible verses, yet are *proponents* of having it spit out outrageously profane limericks which are offensive to Christians, Jews, Muslims, Atheists, Men, Women, Children, Mothers, Fathers, Bosses, Frenchmen, and all breeds of dog in between. > If you > don't like it then what stops you from simply not looking at > it! Is something forcing you to use fortune or Cygwin or open > and look at the contents of that file?!? > Is something telling me that fortune is loaded with material completely inappropriate for work environments, material which could conceivably even directly result in "harassment" claims? Answer there is "no" my friend. > [x] Because of the hub bub raised by the religious folk I had > to download and check it out whereas if they just ignored it > so would have I, proofing, once again, that by doing this > they just draw more attention to it and cause more harm than good. > Ok, so you have actually been harmed by this. While I haven't, I can certainly agree with you that this profanity needs excision post haste. > -- > E Pluribus Modem Ok, that doesn't even make sense. -- Gary R. Van Sickle -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/