Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:06:00 -0800
From: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes <sthoenna AT efn DOT org>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Obscene content in cygwin file.
Message-ID: <20050106090559.GB2640@efn.org>
References: <007b01c4f3a8$b49ba110$05010e0a AT 2mbit DOT com> <20050106043831 DOT GA7846 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20050106094528 DOT F80911 AT logout DOT sh DOT cvut DOT cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050106094528.F80911@logout.sh.cvut.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Organization: bs"d
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 09:57:48AM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:32:14PM -0500, Brian Bruns wrote:
> > >Remember, alot of these have been in the fortunes package for god
> > >knows how long, and Cygwin isn't the only one thats going to have
> > >them.  I'm betting that any distro that has the Fortunes package has
> > >them too.
> >
> > Right.  The README of the package says this:
> >
> >   The potentially offensive fortunes are installed by default on FreeBSD
> >   systems.  If you're absolutely, *positively*,
> >   without-a-shadow-of-a-doubt sure that your user community goes
> >   berzerk/sues your pants off/drops dead upon reading one of them, edit
> >   the Makefile in the subdirectory datfiles, and do "make all install".
> >
> > So, we do undoubtedly have the default version and I am undoubtedly
> > getting more prudish about this type of thing.
> >
> > Maybe we need a vote.  I would really like to know how people feel about
> > this.  We haven't had a vote in a long time so:
> >
> > How do you feel about the off-color content in the cygwin fortune files?
> >
> >   [ ] Offended.  Think about the children!
> >   [X] Not offended.  Stop bothering me with your Puritanical values.
> >   [ ] Don't care.  Can we go back to talking about how negative this list is now?
> >
> Offensive fortunes should probably be accessible only through -o optiona but
> they definitely _must_ stay there. I would not even bother encoding them with
> rot13.

No choice but to.  -o files are expected to be rot13-encoded by the program.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/